If that were so, the procedure of the first half of the seventeenth century would be “fastened upon American jurisprudence like a strait jacket, only to be unloosed by constitutional amendment.” 743 Fortunately, the states are not tied down by any provision of the Constitution to the practice and procedure that existed at the common law, but may avail themselves of the wisdom gathered by the experience of the country to make changes deemed to be necessary. Non-Judicial Proceedings.-A court proceeding is not a requisite of due process. 745 Administrative and executive proceedings are not judicial, yet they may satisfy the Due Process Clause. 746 Moreover, the Due Process Clause does not require de novo judicial review of the factual conclusions of state regulatory agencies, 747 and may not require judicial review at all. 748 Nor does the Fourteenth Amendment prohibit a state from conferring judicial functions upon non-judicial bodies, or from delegating powers to a court that are legislative in nature. 749 Further, it is up to a state to determine to what extent its legislative, executive, and judicial powers should be kept distinct and separate. The Requirements of Due Process.-Although due process tolerates variances in procedure “appropriate to the nature of the case,” 751 it is nonetheless possible to identify its core goals and requirements.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |